SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Mile High Report

Denver Broncos Free Agent Review: Mario Haggan

Joe Webb of the Minnesota Vikings avoids a tackle by Mario Haggan of the Denver Broncos at Mall of America Field at the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome. (Photo by Hannah Foslien/Getty Images)

Hannah Foslien - Getty Images

Joe Webb of the Minnesota Vikings avoids a tackle by Mario Haggan of the Denver Broncos at Mall of America Field at the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome. (Photo by Hannah Foslien/Getty Images)

Mario Haggan joined the Broncos as a free agent on November 4, 2008, and played in the last eight games of that season. The following year, Haggan became the first NFL player to start all sixteen games in a season after not having a single start in seventy-three or more games.


Mario Haggan

#57 / Linebacker / Denver Broncos

6-3

274

Mar 03, 1980

Mississippi State



Overview:

After coming to the Broncos from Buffalo as a free agent in 2008, Haggan started all thirty-two games in 2009 and 2010 -- first as a left outside linebacker, then as a right inside linebacker. He was fourth on the team in tackles in 2009 with 63 total tackles and second on the team in 2010 with 87 total tackles. In his first three seasons in the orange and blue he recorded seven sacks and five forced fumbles. With the return to a 4-3 base defense under new Head Coach John Fox, Haggan logged only one start in fifteen games in 2011 -- though he also recorded the first interception of his nine year career during the 2011 campaign.

Star-divide

2011 Season:


Sacks Interceptions Tackles
G Sacks YdsL Int Yds IntTD Solo Ast Total
2011 - Mario Haggan 16 0 0 1 16 1 13 10 23


Haggan was a three-year starter at Mississippi State University and led his team in tackles each of those years. He was selected by Buffalo in the seventh round of the 2003 NFL draft. He appeared in just one game as a rookie. He appeared in every Buffalo game from 2004 to 2007 but did not record a single start. He did not start a game until 2009. He appeared in all sixteen games in 2011 but did not start until replacing Von Miller against Minnesota. In that game, he led the team with twelve tackles and recorded a game high three tackles for loss. He also returned an interception for a touchdown.


Haggan presents something of a problem for the Broncos. Despite his starting all thirty-two games in 2009-10, the Fox regime obviously saw him as a backup player in 2011. Add that to the fact that the Broncos currently have nine linebackers on their roster (including the Reserve/Future list) -- Haggan, Iwuh, Irving, Mays, Mohamed, Miller, Williams, Woodyard, Obiozor -- and someone will have to go. Haggan is the oldest of that group of nine. It would not surprise me to see the Broncos make a play for Woodyard and let Haggan go.

If resigned, it is projected that Haggan would make a minimum of $925,000. While he is a competent backup, I'm not sure the money could not be better spent elsewhere.

Scouting Report

Pros: A strong, intelligent player with an excellent build for a middle linebacker position. Has the experience of a defensive end. An excellent run-stopper with decent pass rushing skills. Is always around the ball carrier.

Cons: Suffered a number of ankle injuries in college. Slow for a linebacker, or even defensive end. Lacks the size for a defensive end and the speed for a linebacker.

WHAT TO DO?

Given that Haggan will most likely be a backup/special teams player again in 2011, it is questionable whether or not he's worth investing $925,000 in a limited role, nine-year veteran. He might be worth keeping around to push the younger linebackers during OTAs, mini camps and training camp.

Poll
Should the Broncos resign Mario Haggan?
Yes
134 votes
No
108 votes

242 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  24 comments

Comments

Change it...

That was a pick-six against Minnesota, picked Ponder and took it HOME.

I'm confused . . . change what?
Change the stats.

Not change we can believe in.

Ah, gotcha

The stat box was produced by a widget from SBNation, so I simply assumed it was correct. I’ll get it changed straightaway.

At least I referenced the pick six in the text section. ;-p
My apologies...

Sorry…I should have been more clear. Forgive me: I’m new, not that that is any excuse.

No worries, I'm easily confused. ;-p

And since you’re new: a hearty MHR Welcome & look forward to seeing your opinions in print.

Ya, in print...

So if you change your mind later people like Brian and myself can dig them up and throw them in your face! ;)

But seriously, welcome.

I've always like Haggan

He’s a big dude that has made some good plays for the Broncos in the past.

I like Haggan

Is a flexible player who can shift around, but isn’t really starter material. Should be kept around for depth across the front seven.

Haggan really won me over

last year, bring him back for depth

I like Haggan. He played well for us when Von was out or not understanding his scheme responsibilities. I think an upgrade for Haggan should be sought out, but should still be resigned as a good veteran depth player to compete in training camp.

I voted no against personal feelings about Haggan...

I think he is a gifted athlete, but not elite in any sense, but I don’t think he is what Fox is ultimately looking for in a LB. EFX were restrained with a lot of players on the roster that they probably felt needed upgrade, but there is only so much they could do in such a limited time of offseason. This is their 2nd year together and now they have a much better field of view moving forward. I look for several of our FAs looking for work elsewhere this year, with an influx of veteran/youth talent…

If I counted the roster right yesterday, we have 10 spots left for FAs and draftees/UDFAs.

Somebody has to go to make room for the 90 total…Whack ~ Whack ~ Whack…

I like Haggan and think he is valuable depth but I still think he is better in a 3-4 (suited at least).

He did play well in spot duty for Von Miller but as a starter I think he is way too slow to be a LB for us. If one of our LBs went down for the year and Haggan had to step in I’d be extremely worried. So with that in mind I guess I should have voted to let him walk.

In my mind it's not about Woodyard vs. Haggan....

it’s more about Haggan vs. Mays. (Woodyard MUST be kept!) Both are vets, both are better suited as backups, both are better suited for the MLB spot, given this, I think Haggan is more valuable to the team because he is an above average STs player and more instinctive as a football player (does not make the mental mistakes Mays does), plus he’s a leader and well respected on the team. Of course this works really well if Irving pans out as a starting LB. But either way, Mays must go.

Agree

Haggan is a big LB, suited for Sam or Mike. Woody is small for a LB, suited only for Will. No competition.

No room for old folks.
I'm on the fence

If we cut a young guy to retain him for depth I wouldn’t be upset.

If we cut him to promote a project, I wouldn’t be upset.

But we do need a baller at MLB

You know why Fox likes Haggan?

Cus he can play any LB as back up…u need guys like that he said…Haggan likes that role…become indispensable,,,

Speed

If we are going for speed on defense then the decision is easy. Remember Mobley, Gold, Wilson? Damn I miss Al Wilson. But Von has moved into that group

I voted no

But that is more because I think Haggan would be camp fodder. I would rather he go somewhere that lacks what we have in Linebackers so he doesn’t spend a month with the Broncos in training camp only to have to go find a new team after being cut.

I'm fine with bringing him back

I also am a bit confused why folks think $900k is too big a salary for backup players…. this has shown up repeatedly in these FA previews, and just doesn’t make any sense at all to me.

The minimum for younger players is only a couple 100k less, so its not like $900k is gonna prevent a team from signing other players… remember, if you sign the vet to the $900k salary, you still have to pay his replacement (who very well may be a worse player) about $500-$700k…. is that $200k salary difference (out of $130million dollar salary budget) really worth having worse players on the final 53-man roster?

I’m fine with letting him go if the coaches don’t think he has any chance of being one of the top 6 LBs on next year’s team… going younger and faster certainly makes sense given our new defensive scheme.

but citing his salary as a problem, if we can sign him for the vet minimum (I’m guessing we can), just doesn’t seem like a convincing argument.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Mile High Report to post a comment.